PEABODY ENERGY: Still Subject Kivalina’s Action in Calif. Court

Peabody Energy Corporation continues to be involved in an environmental action styled Native Village of Kivalina and City of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corporation, et al.

In February 2008, the Native Village of Kivalina and the City of Kivalina filed a lawsuit…

PEABODY ENERGY: Gold Fields in Talks to Settle Okla. Remediation

Peabody Energy Corporation’s Gold Fields Mining, LLC affiliate continues to participate in discussions to settle remediation matters at Picher, Okla.

In June 2005, Gold Fields and other potentially responsible parties received a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice alleging that…

PEABODY ENERGY: Posts $51.6MM Liabilities for Remediation Costs

Peabody Energy Corporation’s undiscounted liabilities for environmental cleanup-related costs for various sites were US$51.6 million as of June 30, 2011 and US$51.1 million as of Dec. 31, 2010.

Of those amounts, about US$6.6 million as of June 30, 2011 and US$6.3…

CONSOL ENERGY: Still Involved in Northern Appalachia Water Issue

CONSOL Energy Inc. continues to be involved in water and environmental issues regarding Northern Appalachia.

In the Fall of 2009, a fish kill occurred in Dunkard Creek, which is a creek with segments in both Pennsylvania and West Virginia. The fish…

CONSOL ENERGY: Still a PRP at Ward Transformer Site in Wake Co.

CONSOL Energy Inc. continues to be a potentially responsible party at the Ward Transformer site in Wake County, N.C.

The Company was notified in November 2004 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that it is a PRP under the Superfund program…

CONSOL ENERGY: Still Involved in Ryerson Dam Action in Allegheny

CONSOL Energy Inc. continues to be subject to environmental litigation regarding the Ryerson Park Dam.

In 2008, the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (the Commonwealth) filed a six-count Complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pa.,…

PPL CORP: Unit Expends $28MM Through March 31 for Martins Creek

PPL Corporation says that, through March 31, 2011, its PPL Energy Supply, LLC subsidiary has spent US$28 million for remediation for the Martins Creek plant fly ash release and related costs and an insignificant remediation liability remained.

In 2005, there was…

PPL CORP: Potentially Liable for Cleanup at Superfund Locations

PPL Corporation is a potentially responsible party at several sites listed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the federal Superfund program, including the Columbia Gas Plant Site, the Metal Bank site and the Ward Transformer site.

Clean-up actions have been…

PPL CORPORATION: Still Subject to EPA’s NSR Enforcement Efforts

PPL Corporation continues to be subject to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s New Source Review (NSR) enforcement efforts.

This initiative targets coal-fired power plants. The EPA has asserted that modification of these plants has increased their emissions, and consequently they are…

PPL CORP: PPL Energy Supply Unit Subject to Conemaugh River Case

A subsidiary of PPL Corporation’s PPL Energy Supply, LLC subsidiary is subject to an environmental lawsuit regarding discharges at Conemaugh River.

In April 2007, PennEnvironment and the Sierra Club brought a Clean Water Act citizen suit in the U.S. District Court…

Page 1 of 712345»...Last »